How did I Celebrate Valentine’s Day

Its love month again and February 14 is the day of the Valentines Day.Where we can see a lot of flowers, chocolates, teddy bears and a lot more in the streets. A lot of girls and boys with a smile on their faces.

The malls are full of people especially couples. Restaurants and Hotels are fully occupied or booked. And a lot of people are guessing and wishing for surprises.

And how did I celebrate Valentine’s Day? First let me tell you that I`am single. I have no girlfriend since birth and never experienced as much love than others.

But I don’t wanna isolate myself because I’m single. Every year I celebrate Valentine’s Day with my family. We go to the mall and watch a movie together. Eat popcorn, laugh or cry to the movie and eat a lot.

Every year we spend quality time together. I date with my little sister, my father and my mother every Valentine’s Day because we believe that, it’s better to be with the people that you know that will stay with you forever. People who will be with you through good and bad times.

But this year is a very different one. Valentine’s day landed on Saturday of the week. I have classes during Saturday that’s why we didn’t do the same like we’ve gone before.

This Valentine’s day I dated test papers, stress, reviewers and my pen. I started the day waking up at 5 a.m. because I have a 7:30 class. Attend my Journalism class and take the mid term examination.

Not only that, my class will end at 9 p.m because  I have my thesis or MC200 class. We have a very long discussion and consultation for Chapter 5 of the thesis. We finished the discussion and consultation at around 9:30 p.m.

Sad to say that’s life. We are not capable of stopping or bringing back the time. We cannot pause the time to do what you wanna do. We cannot skip the day and go out to have yourself a treat or a date.

At the end of the day, I believe that next Valentine’s Day will be better. No more hassle and stress. Also, I wish and I hope before the Valentine’s Day come, I will have or I will meet the girl that will put a smile in my lips. The girl I will date and the girl that will spend her life with me, forever.

By domarjosh24

Personal Profile

1

Domar Josh R. Misoles – Mass Communication Student – Social Media Enthusiast – Aspiring Photographer – Aspiring Film Maker- Tamaraw – Manila – Philippines

Current: Graduating Mass Communication Student

Status: Single

Siblings: 1

Age: 19

E-mail: domarjosh24@gmail.com / domarjosh@gmail.com

Facebook: facebook.com/domarjoshmisoles

Twitter: twitter.com/domarjosh
College: Far Eastern University

High School: Nazareth School

Grade School: Nazareth School

Favorite Food: Nilaga and Sinigang

Favorite Color: Green; Neon Green

Film/s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZDGJqVm5dQ

By domarjosh24

A Cinema of Desire

“Cinema is the ultimate pervert art. It doesn’t give you what you desire – It tell you how to DESIRE.”

-Slavoj Zizek

Who is Slavoj Zizek?

Slovenian Marxist philosopherpsychoanalyst and cultural critic. He is a senior researcher at the Institute for Sociology and Philosophy, University of LjubljanaSlovenia, international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities and a professor of philosophy and psychoanalysis at the European Graduate School.

Wikipedia.

 

THE PERVERT’S GUIDE TO CINEMA

takes the viewer on an exhilarating ride through some of the greatest movies ever made. Serving as presenter and guide is the charismatic Slavoj Zizek, the Slovenian philosopher and psychoanalyst. With his engaging and passionate approach to thinking, Zizek delves into the hidden language of cinema, uncovering what movies can tell us about ourselves.

 

THE PERVERT’S GUIDE TO CINEMA offers an introduction into some of Zizek’s most exciting ideas on fantasy, reality, sexuality, subjectivity, desire, materiality and cinematic form. Whether he is untangling the famously baffling films of David Lynch, or overturning everything you thought you knew about Hitchcock, Zizek illuminates the screen with his passion, intellect, and unfailing sense of humour. THE PERVERT’S GUIDE TO CINEMA applies Zizek’s ideas to the cinematic canon, in what The Times calls ‘an extraordinary reassessment of cinema.’

 

The film cuts its cloth from the very world of the movies it discusses; by shooting at original locations and on replica sets, it creates the uncanny illusion that Zizek is speaking from within the films themselves. Described by The Times as ‘the woman helming this Freudian inquest,’ director Sophie Fiennes’ collaboration with Slavoj Zizek illustrates the immediacy with which film and television can communicate genuinely complex ideas. Says Zizek: “My big obsession is to make things clear. I can really explain a line of thought if I can somehow illustrate it in a scene from a film. THE PERVERT’S GUIDE TO CINEMA is really about what psychoanalysis can tell us about cinema.”

 

THE PERVERT’S GUIDE TO CINEMA is constructed in three parts. Says Fiennes: ‘The form of the Guide is a deliberately open one. There are three parts, but there could be more. Zizek’s method of thinking is exciting because it’s always building. Things relate forwards and backwards and interconnect into a mind-altering network of ideas. The film’s title is something of a McGuffin – just a way to get you into this network.’

 

 

PART 1

What can the Marx Brothers tell us about the workings of the unconscious? And why exactly do the birds attack in Hitchcock’s masterpiece of horror? Part 1 explores the fictional structures that sustain our experience of reality and the chaotic netherworld of wild drives and desire that undermine that very experience.

 

Providing a blueprint for approaching cinema through a psychoanalytical lens, Part 1 explores key Freudian concepts such as the psyche’s division between Ego, Superego, Id, death drive and libido. Zizek shows how the visual language of films returns to us our deepest anxieties, arousing our desire while simultaneously ‘keeping it at a safe distance, domesticating it, rendering it palpable!’

 

 

PART 2

Playing on cinema’s great tradition for romantic narratives, Part 2 unlocks what these narratives tell us about the critical role that fantasy plays in sexual relationships. ‘Why does our libido need the virtual universe of fantasies?’ asks Zizek.

 

Zizek excavates the nightmarish truth behind Tarkovsky’s dreamy sci-fi Solaris and its chilling reverberations with Vertigo, Hitchcock’s great romantic epic. The consequences are alarming. For the male libidinal economy it appears, ‘the only good woman is a dead woman.’ Zizek argues that it is the very excess of female desire that poses a fundamental threat to male identity.

 

Fantasy can be both pacifying and radically destabilizing. From David Lynch’s Lost Highway and Ingmar Bergman’s Persona to Michael Haneke’s The Piano Teacher, fantasy is the battleground of the war between the sexes. Part 2 interrogates the structure of fantasy that makes the sexual act possible. But it also asks whether this very plague of fantasies is finally staged – like cinema itself – as a defence against anxiety.

 

 

PART 3

Part 3 plays with appearances. Appearances are not deceiving, but extremely efficient. When Dorothy & Co discover The Wizard of Oz is actually an old man behind a curtain, they nonetheless expect him to work his magic. And so he does: the illusion persists. Says Zizek, ‘There is something more real in the illusion than in the reality behind it.’

 

With iconoclastic gusto, Zizek evokes the Gnostic theory of our world as an ‘unfinished reality’ where ‘God bungled his job of creation’. If film itself is structured through cuts, edits and missing scenes, then so too is our own subjective experience. This is perhaps why we can believe in cinema – as well as other systems of faith, paternal, religious and ideological.

 

Zizek shows us that the key to cinema is beyond the narrative, beyond the ‘story’ that we witness. What provides the density of cinematic enjoyment is material form beyond interpretation.                               

 

Source :

http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/3898330/Slavoj_Zizek_-_The_Pervert_s_Guide_to_Cinema_-_Lacanian_Psychoa

Photo Source :

By domarjosh24

Structuralist Film Theory

Image

 

What is Structuralism?

Structuralism is a theoretical paradigm in sociologyanthropology and linguistics positing that elements of human culture must be understood in terms of their relationship to a larger, overarching system or structure. It works to uncover the structures that underlie all the things that humans do, think, perceive, and feel. Alternatively, as summarized by philosopher Simon Blackburn, Structuralism is “the belief that phenomena of human life are not intelligible except through their interrelations. These relations constitute a structure, and behind local variations in the surface phenomena there are constant laws of abstract culture”.

-Wikipedia

 

Structuralism is a method of analysis first developed to study the structure of language. It was then used to interrogate the relationship between a form of popular culture (mythology) and the culture that produced it. 

 

http://www.jahsonic.com/StructuralistFilmTheory.html

What is Structuralist Film Theory?

According to Wikipedia Structuralist film theory is a branch of film theory that is rooted in Structuralism, itself based on structural linguistics. Structuralist film theory emphasizes how films convey meaning through the use of codes and conventions not dissimilar to the way languages are used to construct meaning in communication.

 

while according to thefreedictionary.com structuralism film theory is a theory that uses culturally interconnected signs to reconstruct systems of relationships rather than studying isolated, material things in themselves.

 

Structuralist film theory is particularly  formulated by Ferdinand de Saussure and Roman Jakobson while Anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss used structuralism to study the kinship systems of different societies. No single element in such a system has meaning except as an integral part of a set of structural connections. These interconnections are said to be binary in nature and are viewed as the permanent, organizational categories of experience. Structuralism has been influential in literary criticism and history, as with the work of Roland Barthesand Michel Foucault. In France after 1968 this search for the deep structure of the mind was criticized by such “poststructuralists” as Jacques Derrida, who abandoned the goal of reconstructing reality scientifically in favor of “deconstructing” the illusions of metaphysics.

 

One of my more recent visual projects is a short animated film designed to introduce key concepts in structuralist and poststructuralist literary theory by Derrida.

 Image

 

 

Photo Sources: 

By domarjosh24

Philippine Sex Melodrama

 

First of all we determine what is Philippine Sex Film, Sex Films and Sex Melodrama Genre

 

Sex Films

Sex films are sites for power discourse. its objective is to determine how women characters are portrayed in certain types of films in terms of sexuality and power.

 

– Jamal Abbas

 

Philippine Sex Film

Sex in the Philippine cinema has to be seen as always enmeshed in power: the power to suffer pleasure, the power to address desire, the power of agents to resist both craving and conscription as sexual labor and capital. thus, this article analyze the different power discourses in specific sex melodramas with sex workers as filmic theme. 

-Patrick Flores

 

Sex Melodrama 

A genre which sexuality is coded in a film.

 

How did the Philippine Sex Melodrama started?

 

It was first called as BOMBA in the Philippine cinema which portrayed nudity and passionate sex acts.

The first bomba films namely Uhaw and Hayok which became famous and the birth of the new genre in Philippine cinema : The Sex Melodrama.

 

Image

Hayok starring by Maria Isabel Lopez, George Estregan, Susan Bautista and others. while Uhaw by Titto Valla, Tito Legaspi and Merle Fernandez.

 

Philippine Sex Melodramas centered on love, family relationship,love triangle, sex workers and more.

Some other Famous Sex Melodrama Films

 

Burlesk Queen, Ngayon(1999), Tikim(2001), and Boatman(1984)

 

In the late 70’s in the Philippines, To be a STAR or in our language BITUIN you had to go through bold film.

Be amazed as in the Philippine TV or Cinema which we saw as premiered actress in telenovelas like Gloria Diaz, Elizabeth Oropesa, Chandra Romero, Daria Ramirez, Alma Moreno, Lorna Tolentino, Rio Locsin, Amy Austria, Dina Bonnevie, Gina Alajar, Chere Gil and even Vilma Santos who almost reinvent herself through bold roles namely Rosas sa Putika(1976) and Burlesk Queen(1997).

 

Film Theories that can fit or perfectly applied on Philippine Sex Melodrama Films

 

Male Gaze Theory – which female stars are objects of desire while women are regarded as mere sex object.

Feminist film theory – Women which are the main star of the film and more famous. they dominate men in some aspects of the movie.

 

The Downfall of Philippine Sex Melodrama 

During Marcos time when he prohibit selling, viewing or producing sex films and today mainly because Philippine Sex Melodramas are no longer allowed to watch, to exhibit or to view without proper or legal consultations and permits. Due to strict policy, Few people watch Sex Melodramas.

 

Photos Url/Source : http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-n2eHGEul-ts/Tc_eBhQSpdI/AAAAAAAAZ-s/b4R39yB_A-E/s1600/Uhaw-%2B1970-sf.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h2gIlPTMDtU/TabgF-i7Z4I/AAAAAAAARp4/m4j0AIx_iHs/s1600/Hayok-86-%2BMaria%2BIsabel%2BLopez-sf.jpg

 

By domarjosh24

The Male Gaze Theory

The Male Gaze is a term from Gaze theory that describes the tendency of works to assume a (straight) male viewpoint even when they do not have a specific narrative Point of view, and in particular the tendency of works to present female characters as subjects of implicitly male visual appreciation.

Image

 The concept of gaze is one that deals with how an audience views the people presented. 

Laura Mulvey coined the term male gaze in 1975. She believes that in film audiences have to view characters from the perspective of a heterosexual male.

One of the most obvious results of Male Gaze is the way a (usually male) director/cameraman’s interest in women informs his shots, leading to a focus on breasts, legs, asses and other jiggly bits even when the film isn’t necessarily supposed to be a T&A-fest. For example, a sex scene between a man and a woman may show more of her body than it does of his, or focus more on her reactions than his . Alternatively, it could appear in shows that aren’t overtly sexual – for example, scenes of bikini-clad female characters talking that emphasize their bodies rather than showing just their heads.

Image

 

The woman is usually displayed on two different levels:

 

–         as an erotic object for both the characters within the film

 

–         the spectator who is watching the film

Image

The man emerges as the dominant power within the created film fantasy. The woman is passive to the active gaze from the man. This adds an element of ‘patriarchal’ order and it is often seen in “illusionistic narrative film”.

 

Mulvey argues that, in mainstream cinema, the male gaze typically takes precedence over the female gaze, reflecting an underlying power asymmetry.

 

Mulvey’ also states that the female gaze is the same as the male gaze because women look at themselves through the eyes of men. A feminist may see the male gaze as either a manifestation of unequal power between gazer and gazed, or as a conscious or subconscious attempt to develop that inequality. From this perspective, a woman who welcomes an objectifying gaze may be simply seeking to benefit men, welcoming such objectification may be viewed as akin to exhibitionism.

 

The Male Gaze typically focuses on:

 

–         Emphasising curves of the female body

 

–         Referring to women as objects rather than people

 

–         The display of women is how men think they should be perceived

 

–         Female viewers, view the content through the eyes of
     a man

even for ads and commecial for men and women we can clearly see the Male Gaze 

 

ImageImage

 

A subtle psychological effect of this is that, in visual media, audiences are primed to sympathise with, or at least respect, characters if the first prominent shot of them concentrates on their face. If it shows another body part the audience is more likely to see the character as a threat, or an object of desire. It isn’t difficult to override this later, but the audience will usually experience it at least subconsciously as a twist.

 

Source: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MaleGaze

http://katiehamilton25.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-male-gaze-theory.html

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Male_gaze

https://www.google.com.ph/search?q=male+gaze&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=J077UqjdH-eciAevjYBY&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=624#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=NNjOfaYRJrx7CM%253A%3B0ihRAtrLeJMgcM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Floismclaughlin.files.wordpress.com%252F2012%252F09%252Fthe-male-gaze.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Floismclaughlin.wordpress.com%252F2012%252F09%252F17%252Fexample-of-the-male-gaze%252F%3B2505%3B3543

https://www.google.com.ph/search?q=male+gaze&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=J077UqjdH-eciAevjYBY&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=624#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=-O_MNW1U6d-xUM%253A%3B39Sz819XvaCP0M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252F3.bp.blogspot.com%252F_beuhg0sgwzA%252FS6su14auyDI%252FAAAAAAAAACE%252FvoW2YI-ExxY%252Fs1600%252Fmegan-fox-transformers.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Frealizziie.blogspot.com%252F2010%252F03%252Ffemale-gaze-vs-male-gaze-has-there-been.html%3B600%3B399

http://www.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2F1101e2group4.blogspot.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fbeer-campaigns-and-male-gaze-final.html&h=0&w=0&sz=1&tbnid=TkJrQ7ZU8AliXM&tbnh=120&tbnw=160&zoom=1&docid=zxBuQhEb1TRkfM&ei=7lL7Uq_9Fq6eiAegyYCwAQ&ved=0CAUQsCUoAQ

 

 

By domarjosh24

Metz and ApparatusTheory

What is apparatus theory? 

 

  • According to the Wikipedia apparatus theory is derived in part from Marxist film theory, semiotics, and psychoanalysis, was a dominant theory within cinema studies during the 1970s. It maintains that cinema is by nature ideological because its mechanics of representation are ideological. Its mechanics of representation include the camera and editing. The central position of the spectator within the perspective of the composition is also ideological. Also, Apparatus theory argues that cinema maintains the dominant ideology of the culture within the viewer. Ideology is not imposed on cinema, but is part of its nature.

Apparatus theory follows an institutional model of spectatorship.

  • Apparatus’ is another word for the means in which a specific production is created. In the case of film / cinema, the film projector and the screen. Apparatus Theory is a model of spectatorship and institutions. It argues that cinema is ideological (based on ideas) because the films are created to represent reality. This means that because film is created to illustrate different ideas, everything has meaning – from the camerawork to the editing. It argues that ideology is not imposed on cinema, but is part of its nature (through the viewer) and it shapes how we think. Apparatus theory was dominant in the 1970s (following the 1960s where psychoanalytical theories and debates were very popular) and is derived from a combination of Marxist theory, semiotics and psychoanalysis. In film theory, the idea is that representation must include the mechanics of film, for example the camera and editing. The production of meaning in a film text, the way a text constructs a viewing subject and the mechanics of making a film all affect the representation of the subject. This theory is that the central position of the spectator/ viewer within the perspective of the text is also ideological – it is a reproduced reality and the experience of cinema influences the viewer on a deep level.

 

Who is Christian Metz?

Christian Metz – was a French film theorist, best known for pioneering the application of Ferdinand de Saussure’s theories of semiology to film. 

Metz was born in Beziers. During the 1970s, his work had a major impact on film theory in France, Britain, Latin America and the United States.

In Film Language: A Semiotics of Cinema, Metz focuses on narrative structure — proposing the “Grand Syntagmatique”, a system for categorizing scenes (known as “syntagms”) in films.

Metz applied both Sigmund Freud’s psychology and Jacques Lacan’s mirror theory to the cinema, proposing that the reason film is popular as an art form lies in its ability to be both an imperfect reflection of reality and a method to delve into the unconscious dream state.

 

Metz’s foundational essay ‘The Imaginary Signifier’ is an exemplary account of the film/spectator relationship, providing what was to become a model for the use of psychoanalytic theory in film criticism.  In the scientific manner that characterized post-revolution film studies, Metz sets out to define exactly what the cinema is and how it differs from the other arts.  He proposes that the main distinguishing factor is that the cinema is a signifier whose presence is absence, i.e. the act of perception takes place in real time, but the spectator is viewing an object which is pre-recorded and thus already absent: it is the object’s ‘replica in a new kind of mirror’ (Metz 2000, 410).  He states that, ‘[m]ore than the other arts…the cinema involves us in the imaginary: it drums up all perception, but to switch it immediately over into its own absence, which is none the less the only signifier present’ (Metz 2000, 410).  

Image

Source : 

http://media.edusites.co.uk/article/film-theory-and-language/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Metz_(critic) , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparatus_theory 

https://www.google.com.ph/search?q=metz+apparatus+theory&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=y0n7Uq3wEaqO2gXfyYCIDg&sqi=2&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=624#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=oGGCtyDt07LQiM%253A%3BhCwfnNVwfX0yvM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fecx.images-amazon.com%252Fimages%252FI%252F4192jrok5OL._BO2%252C204%252C203%252C200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click%252CTopRight%252C35%252C-76_AA300_SH20_OU15_.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.amazon.ca%252FThe-Imaginary-Signifier-Psychoanalysis-Cinema%252Fdp%252F0253203805%3B300%3B300

The Matrix 1999 (Film Review)

What if virtual reality wasn’t just for fun, but was being used to imprison you? That’s the dilemma that faces mild-mannered computer jockey Thomas Anderson (Keanu Reeves) in The Matrix. It’s the year 1999, and Anderson (hacker alias: Neo) works in a cubicle, manning a computer and doing a little hacking on the side. It’s through this latter activity that Thomas makes the acquaintance of Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne), who has some interesting news for Mr. Anderson — none of what’s going on around him is real. The year is actually closer to 2199, and it seems Thomas, like most people, is a victim of The Matrix, a massive artificial intelligence system that has tapped into people’s minds and created the illusion of a real world, while using their brains and bodies for energy, tossing them away like spent batteries when they’re through. Morpheus, however, is convinced Neo is “The One” who can crack open The Matrix and bring his people to both physical and psychological freedom. The Matrix is the second feature film from the sibling writer/director team of Andy Wachowski and Larry Wachowski, who made an impressive debut with the stylish erotic crime thriller Bound.

~ Mark Deming, Rovi

 This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.

 

Image

 

 As Neo reaches for the red pill Morpheus warns Neo “Remember, all I’m offering is the truth. Nothing more.”

 

The film as a whole and especially the choosing scene is deeply compelling. Why is the choice between what you believe you know and an unknown ‘real’ truth so fascinating? How could a choice possibly be made? On the one hand everyone you love and everything that you have built you life upon. One the other the promise only of truth.

 

The question then is not about pills, but what they stand for in these circumstances. The question is asking us whether reality, truth, is worth pursuing. The blue pill will leave us as we are, in a life consisting of habit, of things we believe we know. We are comfortable, we do need truth to live. The blue pill symbolises commuting to work every day, or brushing your teeth.

 

The red pill is an unknown quantity. We are told that it can help us to find the truth. We don’t know what that truth is, or even that the pill will help us to find it. The red pill symbolises risk, doubt and questioning. In order to answer the question, you can gamble your whole life and world on a reality you have never experienced.
 
 

 

 

 

 

(C)

http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/177524/The-Matrix/overview

By domarjosh24

“The whole of life is just like watching a film. Only it’s as though you always get in ten minutes after the big picture has started, and no-one will tell you the plot, so you have to work it out all yourself from the clues.” ― Terry Pratchett, Moving Pictures

FILM CRITICISM AND THEORIES

 

FILM CRITICISM 

Film Criticism is the analysis and evaluation of films, individually and collectively. In general, this can be divided into journalistic criticism that appears regularly in newspapers, and other popular, mass-media outlets and academic criticism by film scholars that is informed by film theory and published in academic journals.

 

THEORIES

FEMINIST THEORY

 

Feminist Theory 

Feminist theory is one of the major contemporary sociological theories, which analyzes the status of women and men in society with the purpose of using that knowledge to better women’s lives. Feminist theorists have also started to question the differences between women, including how race, class, ethnicity, and age intersect with gender. Feminist theory is most concerned with giving a voice to women and highlighting the various ways women have contributed to society.

 

Gender Studies

Gender studies is a field of interdisciplinary study and academic field devoted to gender identity and gendered representation as central categories of analysis. This field includes women’s studies (concerning women, feminism, gender, and politics), men’s studies, and LGBT studies. Sometimes, gender studies is offered together with study of sexuality. These disciplines study gender and sexuality in the fields of literature, language, history, political science, sociology, anthropology, cinema, media studies, human development, law, and medicine. It also analyzes race, ethnicity, location, nationality, and disability.

 

PERFORMANCE THEORY

Performance studies is the academic field concerned with the study of performance in any of its various forms. The term ‘performance’ is broad, and can include artistic and aesthetic performances like concerts, theatrical events, and performance art; sporting events; social, political and religious events like rituals, ceremonies, proclamations and public decisions; certain kinds of language use; and those components of identity which require someone to do, rather than just be, something. Consequently, performance studies is interdisciplinary, drawing from theories of the performing arts, anthropology and sociology, literary theory, and legal studies.

 

SPECTATORSHIP THEORY

Its nature is to not look at how viewers respond to a film statistically and scientifically, but instead at how the viewer is involved, implicated and engaged in the viewing experience. What many of today’s most interesting filmmakers want to do is ‘subjectivise’ us through a combination of emotionally engaging us and at the same time forcing upon us an awareness of that engagement. They want any idea to be contained by a strong emotional reaction. 

 

ETHNICITY THEORY

Ethnicity theory says that race is a social category and is but one of several factors in determining ethnicity. Some other criteria include: “religion, language, “customs,” nationality, and political identification” (Omi & Winant 15). This theory was put forth by sociologist Robert E. Park in the 1920s. It is based on the notion of “culture”.

 

AUTEUR THEORY

Auteur theory is a view of film making in which the director is considered the primary creative force in a motion picture

 

 

 

 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/auteur%20theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_studies

http://sociology.about.com/od/Sociological-Theory/a/Feminist-Theory.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_studies

 

 

 

 

 

By domarjosh24

Best Hairstyle No. 4

asaBrush Up Hairstyle. I call it best because when you brush your hair upwards it looks more fashionable and less effort when fixing it. try this hairstyle promise you, it’s one of the best.

 

“I am, indeed, a king, because I know how to rule myself.”

-Pietro Arentino

By domarjosh24